Home > DUII > Legal
Contents
Criminal vs Administrative Law
- A person can be too intoxicated to safely operate a motor vehicle at a BAC lower than 0.08%
- Under criminal DUII law, the standard for intoxication is exactly the same regardless of age.
- “Zero tolerance” exception for underage drinking drivers only refers to the administrative license suspension process
- An officer can't testify to an estimated BAC based solely on SFST performance
- An officer may immediately suspend a driver’s license under Oregon’s Implied Consent Laws.
- This is the administrative blood alcohol limit
- 0.08% BAC (or greater) doesn't mean an assured criminal conviction
- Documented existence of “impairment” in conjunction with a 0.08% BAC (or greater) is always needed in criminal court.
- Lower BACs may be used to prosecute but must be combined with documented clues of impairment.
- An officer must witness “impairment” in a DUII case because an officer’s observations of impairment are necessary to develop probable cause for the arrest & subsequent search of the person believed to be DUII
- The “Right to Counsel” applies to criminal DUII law.
- This relates to a person’s guaranteed right to contact an attorney by phone when placed under arrest and the person requests such contact.
- A request to speak to counsel should be granted.
- Right to privacy
- The “Right to Communicate” applies to administrative (Implied Consent) law.
- This relates to affording a person the reasonable opportunity to communicate with anyone regarding the decision to take a test
- No right to privacy, but it should be given.
Criminal DUII Law
Elements of DUII (811.010)
Basis for Arrest
Penalties
- A DUII is a Class A misdemeanour
- A DUII is a felony when the subject has:
- 2 prior convictions for DUII in the prior 10 years in any jurisdiction
- 90 days minimum jail
- 3 prior convictions for DUII in the prior 10 years in any jurisdiction
- presumptive prison for 3 or more years
- In addition to any other sentence a minimum fine of:
- 1st conviction: $1000.00.
- 2nd conviction: $1500.00
- 3rd or subsequent conviction: $2000.00 if the person is not sentenced to a term of imprisonment.
- If BAC >=0.15%: Minimum fine is $2000.00
Diversion
When asked to explain diversion by defendant:
- Don't give advice to an arrested person about “Diversion”.
- When asked about eligibility, etc., direct the subject to an attorney or to the DMV.
- Document ANY injuries, especially the arrest involves a crash that did, or might, result in death or physical injury to any person other than the defendant.
- This is necessary documentation for the DA to ensure that the defendant does NOT qualify for a “Diversion” agreement
- An agreement between the defendant and the Court in which the State will forego prosecution and sentencing for a one year period of time in exchange for the defendant’s agreement to complete certain requirements.
- Defendant must agree to plead guilty to the crime of DUII.
- During this one year the subject may also be required to:
- Be evaluated by a substance abuse counsellor.
- Participate in an alcohol abuse education class while abstaining from all intoxicants.
- Pay all associated fees and fines imposed by the Court.
- Not have alcohol in their system while driving a vehicle for a period of one year.
- Required to install ignition interlock device if the person has driving privileges.
- If the Defendant meets all of the Court’s requirements, at the end of one year:
- The DUII charge will be dismissed, but the charge stays on the person’s record.
- The diversion does not, however, count as an enhancement factor (prior DUII) for a felony DUII.
- If the subject doesn't complete the Diversion agreement, the Court will convict and sentence the subject to the offence of DUII.
- The present DUII didn't involve a crash resulting in death or physical injury to any person other than the defendant
- No pending DUII offence in any jurisdiction
- No prior conviction for DUII in any jurisdiction within 15 years
- Not participating in a DUII diversion program in any jurisdiction
- Not participated in a DUII diversion program in any jurisdiction within 15 years;
- No pending or prior conviction for murder, manslaughter, criminally negligent homicide or assault that resulted from the operation of a motor vehicle for 15 years in any jurisdiction
- Generally a person is eligible for diversion on their first arrest for DUII.
- The court may also take into consideration whether the person would be a good candidate for diversion.
Implied Consent Law
Anyone who operates a motorised vehicle (with or without a license) on premises open to the public has given consent to take a breath, blood, or urine test when under arrest for DUII & asked to do so or their driving privileges are subject to suspension. (813.100, 813.131)
For Implied Consent to be applicable, without a crash, the person must take a breath test and not a blood test
If the suspect is at the hospital, not due to injuries sustained in a crash, obtain blood if there's PC and exigency. Do not read Implied Consent Rights and Consequences
A police officer may obtain a blood or urine sample from an unconscious person they have PC to believe the person has been driving DUII and that evidence of the offence will be found in their blood or urine (813.140)
For Implied Consent to be applicable, without a crash, the person must take a breath test and not a blood test
If the suspect is at the hospital, not due to injuries sustained in a crash, obtain blood if there's PC and exigency. Do not read Implied Consent Rights and Consequences
A police officer may obtain a blood or urine sample from an unconscious person they have PC to believe the person has been driving DUII and that evidence of the offence will be found in their blood or urine (813.140)
Do not use implied consent If someone other than the suspect is seriously injured or killed
Failure of a Chemical Test
- BAC 0.08% or more if not driving a commercial motor vehicle
- BAC 0.04% or more if driving a commercial motor vehicle
- Any amount if under 21 years of age.
Required Elements for Licence Suspension
- The person is under arrest for DUII
- The person operated a motor vehicle upon a public highway or a premise open to the public.
- The police had “Probable Cause” to make the arrest
- The person had been informed of rights and consequences.
- person refused the test or failed the test with:
- 0.08% or more if not driving a commercial motor vehicle;
- 0.04% or more if driving a commercial motor vehicle; or
- Any amount if under 21 years of age.
- The person administering the test is qualified.
- Breath testing methods, procedures and instrument used were all approved by Oregon State Police.
Offences and Consequences
- Non-commercial driver
- Failure
- 90 day suspension
- 1 year if within the last 5 years:
- Convicted of DUII
- Had driving privileges suspended under Implied Consent Law
- Participated in a DUII diversion or similar program
- Refusal
- 1 year
- 3 years if within the last 5 years:
- Convicted of DUII
- Had driving privileges suspended under Implied Consent Law
- Participated in a DUII diversion or similar program
- Commercial driver
- Faillure
- 1 year
- 3 years, if hazardous materials are involved
- Lifetime, if subject has a prior CDL suspension
- Refusal
- 3 years
- 5 years, if hazardous materials are involved
- Lifetime, if subject has a prior CDL suspension
- Refusal of a urine test
- Treated as a breath test refusal.
- Suspension will be consecutive to any other Implied Consent suspension
- Waiting
- Failure to submit to a breath test or to provide a urine sample results in a $650 fine (813.095)
- Not eligible for a hardship permit for at least 90 days, & possibly more (813.130(3)(d))
Right to an Independent Test
- A subject has the right to an independent chemical test
- No such right if the subject refuses o take the chemical test requested by the officer
- The subject must be give a reasonable opportunity to a test
- Officers should use “reasonable person standard”.
- The test will be at the expense of the subject.
- The person administering the chemical test must be qualified
- The failure or inability to obtain an independent test or tests by a person will not preclude the admission of evidence relating to a test or tests taken upon the request of a police officer
- This doesn’t mean that an officer can deny the subject a reasonable opportunity to obtain an independent test.
- DO NOT simply book the person in jail and assume they will be released in a reasonable amount of time to get an independent test
Actions on Miranda Invocation
Asking a defendant to participate in SFST after invocation of Miranda rights constitutes impermissible interrogation that violates the person’s rights
The above applies to asking a defendant to give a breath/blood/urine test after they have invoked
The following don't apply if an officer simply gives Miranda warnings to a person at the outset of a DUII investigation as long as the person does not invoke
The above applies to asking a defendant to give a breath/blood/urine test after they have invoked
The following don't apply if an officer simply gives Miranda warnings to a person at the outset of a DUII investigation as long as the person does not invoke
Standard DUII: Prior to SFST
Do NOT
- Ask any more questions:
- Ask them to perform field sobriety tests
- Read the Rohrs Admonishment
- Make the arrest
- Throughly document observations of impairment
- Once at the station:
- Get a warrant and include in the warrant a request for breath and/or blood
- If you believe at the outset that drugs are involved include urine in the warrant.
- Do NOT read implied consent
- If the subject chooses to provide a breath sample pursuant to the warrant, but the results are inconsistent with the impairment observed:
- Get blood
- If the warrant includes urine, ask the defendant for urine if they are willing to provide it
- Make sure to include language for the testing of whatever sample is obtained
Standard DUII: Post SFST
PC to arrest for DUII (or has already been arrested)
- Do not ask any more questions.
- Do not ask for consent for a breath test
- Get a warrant for breath and blood
- if you believe at the outset that drugs are involved include urine in the warrant
- Do NOT read implied consent
- If the subject chooses to provide a breath sample pursuant to the warrant, but the results are inconsistent with the impairment observed:
- Also get blood
- If the warrant includes urine, ask the defendant for urine if they are willing to provide it
- Make sure to include language for the testing of whatever sample is obtained.
Motor Vehicle Accident
- If someone other than the defendant is killed or injured AND the defendant invokes
- do not ask them any more questions.
- Do NOT
- Ask for consent to perform SFST
- Read the Rohrs Admonishment
- Ask for consent for a blood draw
- Obtain the suspect’s blood pursuant to PC and Exigency
- At the same time have an officer working on the warrant draw. Include in the warrant:
- The seizure of any hospital draw that was taken and
- The testing of the exigency draw, warrant draw and any hospital draw if one was taken
- Very carefully document all grounds for PC and the foundation for exigency
- XXXSee exigency worksheet.
- Do NOT read implied consent
- If the defendant is the only one injured AND the defendant invokes
- Don't ask any more questions.
- Depending on the circumstances, get blood evidence pursuant to PC and exigency and,
- In every case, get a warrant. Include in the warrant:
- The seizure of any hospital draw that was taken and
- The testing of any sample taken
- Very carefully document all grounds for PC and the foundation for exigency if an exigency draw was taken.
- Do NOT read implied consent
© 2020-2025 Ross Dargahi - Disclaimer - About - Feedback